Module
Abstracts & Review.
Collect abstracts, run reviews, and publish decisions — in a clean workflow your committee can manage without spreadsheets.
Pricing key
module:mod_abstracts
A real submission portal
Collect abstracts properly (not by email): forms, attachments, deadlines, and clear status.
Review without spreadsheets
Give reviewers a focused portal with rubrics and scoring.
Fair and consistent evaluation
Rubric-based scoring keeps reviews structured and comparable.
Decisions you can trust
Keep committee work organized and communicate outcomes confidently.
What it helps you do
A complete abstracts workflow in plain steps
- Open a call-for-abstracts with clear rules and deadlines.
- Collect submissions in a consistent format, with optional attachments.
- Let submitters track status without emailing your team.
- Support reviewer assignments and keep the workload manageable.
- Score with rubrics so decisions are consistent and auditable.
- Turn accepted work into the program later (when you’re ready).
Who it’s for
Built for committees
Scientific/program committee
You need a structured way to collect, review, and decide on submissions.
Reviewers
You want a clean interface to score and comment, without juggling documents.
Presenters
They need a simple portal to submit, upload, and track progress.
How it works
Configure → collect → review → decide
Step 1
Configure the call
Set deadlines, guidelines, and what information submitters must provide.
Step 2
Collect submissions
Presenters submit through the portal and can see their status.
Step 3
Review and decide
Reviewers score using rubrics and the committee finalizes decisions.
Standalone vs integrated
Start with Abstracts, add modules later
Standalone
- Run abstracts end-to-end even if you don’t enable scheduling yet.
- Perfect for conferences that finalize decisions before building the program.
- Keep reviewer work organized with structured rubrics.
Integrated
- Website can link “Submit Abstract” and host guidelines PDFs.
- Event turns accepted abstracts into sessions and tracks.
- Badges/Attendance support on-site identity and verification for presenters.
Common scenarios
What this replaces
University research symposium
Students and faculty submit abstracts, reviewers score, committee publishes outcomes.
Multi-track scientific conference
Structured rubrics help keep review fair across different study types.
Late-breaking submissions
Run a separate window and keep everything organized and consistent.
Works great with
Modules that connect seamlessly
Start with Abstracts to run submissions and review. Add modules when you’re ready to publish schedules, run on-site ops, or create a full attendee experience.
Website & CMS
Put “Submit Abstract” in your navigation and host guidelines on your conference domain.
Event & Logistics
Use accepted abstracts as inputs to build the schedule.
Badges & Check-in
Support presenter identity and on-site access when you’re ready.
Attendance & Verification
Support verified participation flows when attendance evidence matters.
FAQ
Common questions
Can presenters edit after submitting?
You can run a submission window so edits are allowed during that period and then locked after closing.
Do reviewers get a separate portal?
Yes. Reviewers work in a dedicated review experience focused on rubric-based evaluation.
Can we start with Abstracts and add scheduling later?
Yes. Many teams finalize decisions first, then enable Event to build the program from accepted work.
Do we still need guideline PDFs?
If your community expects them, you can host them alongside your submission flow so everything stays in one place.